When did accountability become an “offensive” word?

target-accountability-accountable-deficits
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Holding staff accountable for doing their jobs reduces stress and leads to better outcomes

David FullerI was recently invited to speak at a zoom meeting with leadership professionals from North America. I was talking about the challenge leaders have with accountability within their organizations when I was interrupted by one of the human resource professionals in the group who told me in no uncertain terms that the word accountability was offensive to some people. “Leaders should not be holding people accountable; they should be holding them able.”

Fair enough. We do want to ensure that our people are “able.” Able to come to work, able to do their jobs, able to be respectful, accurate, timely, and on budget. We hire them because they are “able.” Once we know they are able, we need to put systems in place to ensure they are accountable.

For example, I recently worked with a company with considerable stress in the accounting department because people were not filling out their time cards. The accounting staff had to follow up and check the accuracy of the pay period, which was taking time and energy each and every week. The employees were “able” to fill out the time cards, but no one was holding them accountable for doing so, and thus, it had a dysfunctional workplace.

target-accountability-accountable-deficits
More advice on running your business
Business management


Read our series on
Closing the Deal


NEW SERIES!
Startup 101


Webinars
Learning from the pros

The accounting team came up with a solution. People who didn’t fill out their time cards didn’t get paid. It was a system of accountability. Guess what? Within a short period of time, everyone was turning in their time cards! They were ‘able,’ and now they were being held accountable! Problem solved! No offense taken.

Accountability shouldn’t be an offensive word in the workplace. If processes were in place to keep people accountable for their actions around their tasks and responsibilities, most organizations would have less stress and better outcomes.

Accountability starts with us as leaders. If we aren’t accountable for doing our job, which is to keep our team moving forward to fulfill the purpose of our organization, we are failing our team and setting an example for poor performance. Often as leaders, we get caught up doing tasks other people should be doing. We think we are helping them out, but we are simply looking for ways to avoid doing our jobs. We know people can step up and do their jobs in the manner that they have committed themselves to, yet we fail to hold them to those commitments.

Accountability only becomes offensive to people when they believe they are being picked on and are held accountable when others are not. Implementing systems that support performance and accountability ensures that people are not offended when asked to do their jobs. We hire people because they are able, we put systems in place to keep them accountable, and we support people to fulfill their purpose!

Dave Fuller, MBA, is an award-winning business coach and a partner with Pivotleader Inc.

For interview requests, click here.


The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.

© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.