Report card on wait times gets a failing grade

Patients impatiently waiting in doctor's wait room
Reading Time: 4 minutes

By Don Dick
and Linda Woodhouse
University of Alberta

Canadians might have been inclined to take a sedative for an anxiety attack after reading about the Wait Time Alliance’s (WTA) 2014 report card on waits for medical care in Canada. The WTA gives Canada a failing grade on the structural changes it says are needed to have the timely access to care seen in other countries.

But the report card is as notable for its omissions as it is for its findings.

Don Dick
Don Dick

Had the WTA looked more closely at developments in Alberta, for example, it would have found a province where efforts to improve access and other areas of quality are being led by the people with the most influence – the doctors, nurses, administrators and others on the front lines. It would have found a province where comprehensive data is being collected and analyzed to measure performance and target lagging areas. It would have seen that evidence-based benchmarks are being applied in crucial areas of service. It would have seen the integrated models of care that are being designed and implemented.

These are, in fact, some of the very measures the WTA calls for in its report card – already well established in Alberta.

Much of this progress has been concentrated in the area of orthopaedics, a growing area of concern as the population ages and lives longer. Hip and knee replacement, one of the five national areas of priority for reducing wait times, is a big part of this work.

In the orthopaedic wards of hospitals, teams have, since 2010, been using report cards to measure how they are doing in relation to benchmarks. They set targets for wait time, length of stay in hospital, pain reduction, getting patients on their feet after surgery, and many other indicators. When targets are reached, more ambitious ones are set. These teams are driving change in the most effective direction – from the bottom up.

Linda Woodhouse
Linda Woodhouse

Also across the province, data are being collected from hip and knee replacement surgeons and analyzed by the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute. Each surgeon gets a personalized, confidential report twice yearly on results in 17 key indicators. For example, they see their patients’ wait times for consultation and surgery, their improvement in joint function, and how many had to be readmitted to hospital because of complications. These data, in which patient privacy is protected, are aggregated to produce a report for each of five health zones in Alberta.

Reducing length of stay in hospital for hip and knee patients has been a key part of Alberta’s program to cut wait times. Patients who occupy beds longer than necessary block others who are waiting for surgery. Analysis of data showed that many patients were staying in hospital because they hadn’t arranged for help with recovery at home. Renewed effort to ensure patients make the necessary support arrangements has seen hospital stay drop below the four day benchmark.

Centralized intake for hip and knee patients has, for several years, been standard practice across Alberta with the result that patients are being referred and managed much more efficiently.

Central intake clinics routinely offer patients the option to move from the surgeons with the longest wait lists to those with the shortest.

Data on wait times – for consultation and for surgery – have become much more reliable in Alberta thanks to standardization and rules that have eliminated guesswork and confusion. Wait time data has become sophisticated enough that Alberta now can distinguish the additional wait caused by patient postponement of surgery from other factors. Early results indicate that patient postponements for personal reasons such as travel or work account for as much as 15 per cent of the “system” wait time the public sees.

Results of these measures are impressive. Since 2004 when the first ministers set wait time reduction targets in hip and knee replacement and four other priority areas, Alberta has increased the number of hip and knee surgeries by 73 per cent with only a 5 per cent rise in hospital bed use. The program to reduce hospital stay saved 33,000 bed-days from 2010 to 2013 – a value of $33 million. The typical (median) wait has dropped to 15 weeks for consultation with a surgeon and 18 weeks for surgery in Alberta.

Similar work is starting in rheumatoid arthritis, knee injury and osteoporosis.

Alberta is building a culture of continuous improvement in healthcare. This culture is founded on more and better data, innovative thinking, an extraordinary effort to share information, and unprecedented action on the front lines. Wait time reports cards need to examine performance at this level, and Canadians should have this kind of information to grade their health system.

Don Dick is an Edmonton orthopaedic surgeon and Senior Medical Director of the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network (BJHSCN). Dr. Linda Woodhouse holds the David Magee Endowed Chair in Musculoskeletal Clinical Research and is Scientific Director of the BJHSCN.

Don and Linda are Troy Media Thought Leaders. Why aren’t you?

© Troy Media


wait times

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

By Don Dick

Dr. Dick specializes in adult joint arthroplasty (repair and replacement of joints) and in general paediatric orthopaedics (treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in children). Located in Edmonton, he is Alberta Health Services’ Senior Medical Director, Health Outcomes, and prior to that was the Senior Medical Director for AHS’s Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network. Don is also Assistant Clinical Professor in the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Alberta, He served on the Board of Directors of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, and is Past-President of the Alberta Orthopaedic Society.

1 comment

  1. Letter to the Editor:
    Doctors Don
    Dick and Linda Woodhouse quite rightly note the great
    work Alberta has been undertaking to improve the standardization, collection
    and utilization of access and other health system performance related data.
    However, I wish to respond to their comment
    on the tone of the 2014 WTA report card, released June 3, and the notion of
    Canada receiving a failing grade on making structural changes to support timely
    access to care.
    In fact, the WTA reported that there has been
    some improvement in lowering wait times in most provinces from the previous two
    years. Furthermore, the WTA noted that while there has been some progress on
    wait times in Canada, structural changes are also required if improvements in
    wait times are to be sustained. Our report also called on the need to close the
    gap in progress on wait times among provinces and between Canada and other
    leading countries. While we salute and support the progress that has been made
    in many provinces, including Alberta, there remain gaps within regions and
    among provinces that need to be addressed.
    The WTA agrees that wait time data and other
    quality related data are required to support the fostering of a culture of
    continuous improvement in health care. Indeed, we support providing Canadians,
    providers and decision makers with a more comprehensive range of data on which
    to measure and improve health system performance.
    It is also important to continue to highlight
    the shining examples in Canada on innovative care, such as the Alberta Bone and
    Joint Health Initiative, in order to spread the progress across the country and
    benefit all Canadians.
    Sincerely,
    Dr. Chris Simpson
    Chair, Wait Time Alliance and President-elect, Canadian Medical Association

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This